Built for frontline operations

Your procedures already exist.
Now they answer back.

Someone asks a question the way they would ask a colleague. The assistant answers using only your own approved documents and attaches the source. Where the material does not cover it, it says so instead of guessing.

On a phone, mid-task. No folder trees, no laminated printouts from last quarter, no doubt about which version is current.

3 sec.typical response
100%of answers cite a source
0customer data used for training
videns-assistent.dk/app

Videns-assistent

Facility & Service
Ask your question here

Always verify critical instructions against the source document.

The whole idea

The same lookup, wherever the work happens

The film follows the doubt from the moment it appears until the answer stands with its source — in a hospital and in an industrial laundry. And it shows what happens when the answer is not there.

1 min 12 sec · no sound · plays by itself · on-screen text in Danish 1 min 12 sec · no sound · tap for full screen

The problem

An eight-minute walk to a noticeboard

The procedure exists. It is current. It is simply not where the work is being done.

Service assistant · large university hospital

He has been told to run the backup collection route, but does not know the pickup points. The route is pinned to a noticeboard five to eight minutes' walk in the wrong direction. So in practice the answer becomes a guess, a phone call to someone more experienced, or “the way we usually do it”.

Today

The document gets updated. The printout does not.

The procedure is corrected on the shared drive, while last month's version is still hanging in a folder on the floor.

  • People search folders, call a colleague, or guess
  • Nobody knows which version is actually being followed
  • New hires spend weeks learning where things are kept
With the assistant

One question. One answer. One source.

Staff ask in their own words and get the answer from the current, approved version of the procedure, every time.

  • Answers in seconds, on a phone or a shared PC
  • Always citing document, section and revision date
  • Update the document and the answer updates itself
The product

Three parts, one source of truth

This is not a chatbot that knows your industry. It is a search engine over your own documents that happens to write in plain language.

01

Ask and get an answer

Staff type a question on a phone and get the specific answer — not the whole document. The full procedure is attached, so any answer can be checked in seconds.

“Where do samples get collected when the tube system is down?”
02

The library

Every procedure categorised and readable. Search is for when you know your question. The library is for when you do not.

03

The management view

What gets asked, where the procedures fall short, and which ones are approaching their review date. Measurement instead of instinct.

And just as important: what it will not do

Most objections to AI in a regulated workplace come down to these four. So they are stated outright.

  • It does not guess. Where the material gives no basis, it says so. A missing answer is a useful answer.
  • It does not invent sections. Every claim traces back to a document you approved yourself.
  • It does not surface documents the user may not see. Access is enforced during retrieval, not in a prompt. A document a role cannot read never becomes a candidate.
  • It does not train on your data. Processing inside the EU, a data processing agreement, and the option to run it entirely on your own hardware.

See the technical detail →  ·  Security and GDPR →

The measurement nobody has

Every question lands in one of four boxes

Retrieval records the outcome of every single query. This is the point where the product stops being a search box and becomes a management instrument.

Answered

The procedure existed, the user was cleared to see it, the answer held up.

Knowledge gap

A fair question. No document covers it. Now management knows that.

Access gap

The document exists, but this user was not cleared for it. Permissions do not match the job.

Quality problem

The document exists and was found — it just does not answer the question well enough.

Ask a quality manager which procedures are failing their staff and you get an opinion. This turns it into a number, and it accumulates from day one without anyone filing a report.

Who it is for

Anywhere procedures have to be followed, not just filed

The documents change from sector to sector. The mechanism does not.

Hospitals & health

Porters, cleaning and service staff

Room turnaround, positioning, transport and hygiene. Answers on the move, mid-shift, on a phone.

“How is the room prepared for the first procedure of the day?” → sourced answer in 3 sec.
Food & manufacturing

Operations with audited processes

HACCP records, machine procedures and safety data sheets. No more printouts living a life of their own.

“What do I do about a chemical spill?” → sourced answer in 3 sec.
Care & social

Nursing homes and home care

Medication handling, hygiene, transfers and observation. Staff look it up mid-task instead of walking back to an office.

“How do I transfer safely using a sling?” → sourced answer in 3 sec.
Logistics & facilities

Many hands, many tasks

Cleaning standards, routes and workflows. New colleagues become self-sufficient sooner.

“How often does this equipment need cleaning?” → sourced answer in 3 sec.
Delivery

One product, two ways in

We can be deployed where SaaS is ruled out. Same containers, same features — the only difference is whose machines they run on.

Model A

Hosted by us

You start without going through your IT department first. Our infrastructure inside the EU, our model access, a data processing agreement signed before onboarding begins.

Model B

Self-hosted by you

The same containers and a licence key. Your infrastructure, your integrations and your own model provider if that is a requirement. The documents never leave your building.

Public-sector buyers increasingly run their own language models on their own hardware. For them, self-hosting is not a concession we make — it is the entry ticket. A vendor that can only offer SaaS never gets to the second meeting.

Where we are

First organisation

A large Danish university hospital

Pilot under agreement

The assistant was built for the whole hospital, not a single ward. It pulls procedures from the hospital's own document system, and each professional group sees its own work instructions — anaesthesia, surgery, recovery and service staff kept separate — while shared clinical guidelines apply to everyone. A large share of that material consists of regional guidelines used identically across the region, which makes the step from one hospital to the rest of it a short one. How it started.

UseProcedures and work instructions
StatusPilot under agreement
ReferenceWritten permission granted

Where to next